What is the difference between an authoritative source and a non-authoritative source?

The distinction between an authoritative source and a non-authoritative source is primarily based on the reliability and completeness of the data they provide. An authoritative source is typically defined as a system of record where data is considered to be the most accurate and is often the primary repository for certain types of information. For example, in identity management, systems like Active Directory or enterprise resource planning systems often serve as authoritative sources because they directly manage and maintain user identities and their respective attributes.

Non-authoritative sources, in contrast, may contain account data but are not considered primary or definitive. These sources might aggregate or extract data from authoritative sources but are not responsible for the integrity of that data. Such sources could include backups, reports, or other databases that might have outdated or incomplete information.

This understanding emphasizes the importance of tapping into authoritative sources for the most reliable and actionable data within identity governance and management processes, ensuring that decision-making is based on high-quality, accurate information.