Which of the following is NOT a mode of evaluating the access model?

The evaluation of the access model in identity governance can be conducted through various methods that focus on systematic, objective assessments. Automated evaluation refers to methods that use pre-defined criteria and algorithms to assess access rights efficiently across many users and roles. This can save time and reduce the potential for human error.

Manually executing individual role evaluations implies a hands-on approach where administrators review access rights one by one. This usually ensures a deep understanding of specific roles but can be very labor-intensive.

Programmatically triggering evaluations via API allows for seamless integration between systems, enabling automatic evaluations at set intervals or during specific events. This method ensures continuous compliance and quick responsiveness to changes in access policies.

However, direct user feedback is not considered a formal method of evaluating the access model. While it can provide valuable insights into user experiences and perceived access issues, it is subjective and does not fit the objective, systematic nature of the other evaluation methods. User feedback can help inform process improvements but lacks the rigor and repeatability required for a thorough evaluation of the access model.